Free Delivery on 100,000+ Eligible Items  Learn More

Dickies DU336 Sanded Duck Carpenter Pant - 36x30

Model # DU336-RTB3630|Store SKU # 1000754907

Overview

Model # DU336-RTB3630 Store SKU # 1000754907

Pant - 36x30

  1. Double ruler pocket on right leg and angled tool pocket on left leg
  1. Triple needle stitching on back crotch and side seams
  1. Features a extra wide utility belt

Specifications

Dimensions

Packaged Depth (in inches)
0.75
Packaged Height (in inches)
22
Packaged Weight (In lbs)
2
Packaged Width (in inches)
12

Details

ANSI Class
Non ANSI
Closure Style
Button
Country of Origin
O-Other
Fit
Big & Tall
Gender
Men
Length - Inseam (In.)
30
Material
Cotton
Pant Style
Carpenter
Size
XL
Waist Size (In.)
36
Workwear Features
Triple Stitched

Warranty / Certifications

DU336 Sanded Duck Carpenter Pant - 36x30Dickies DU336 Sanded Duck Carpenter Pant - 36x30Pant - 36x30
Dickies
1000754907
CAD46.992023-03-26
The Home Depot Canada
DU336 Sanded Duck Carpenter Pant - 36x30 is rated 4.4 out of 5 by 48.
  • y_2023, m_3, d_25, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.34
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_48
  • loc_en_CA, sid_1000754907, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_homedepot-canada
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-4.0.0
  • CLOUD, getAggregateRating, 80ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
Rated 4 out of 5 by from More pros than cons for these pants... Pros: -Fits as expected -Has enough room to move comfortably in while doing physical jobs -Lots of pockets for holding tools, cellphone, etc. -Fabric is more durable than denim or twill -Fabric is warmer than denim or twill (ie: good for cold weather, bad in hot/humid weather) -Dust & dirt seems to brush off easily enough if pants get dirty from either one (albeit not fully but the pants still look decent enough though) Cons: -Fabric is warmer than denim or twill (ie: good for cold weather, bad in hot/humid weather) -Hammer loop on left side is too small for thicker hammer handles or heavier hammers -Front hands pockets are a little bit narrow for fitting hands through
Date published: 2017-07-15
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Wrong tag size I ordered 34 waist but once received the waist was smaller even though tag showed 34, I compared to older pair and the new pants waist was more like 32?
Date published: 2021-08-29
Rated 1 out of 5 by from Not impressed with company I can’t believe that I received an email asking me for a review on these. I ordered and paid for them and then 10 days later I get an email saying they are not available!!!! Not impressed at all
Date published: 2020-12-20
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Fit long I have worn and loved the white painter pants for several years. Love love love. Ordered the black duck carpenter pants hoping for same experience. Jury is still out. Love the pockets (especially the “cell phone” pocket. They seem longer than the 32” ordered (hoping for some shrinkage there) We’ll see
Date published: 2020-11-11
Rated 2 out of 5 by from they need someone eles to make these pants . who ever is makeing them now need to stop they dont know what there doing . the button is too far away fro the hole .
Date published: 2023-02-16
Rated 5 out of 5 by from great product I`ve been wearing these pants for several years now and can say nothing negative about them. I wish you made work shirts from the same material, that would be a great combo
Date published: 2017-12-09
Rated 5 out of 5 by from A great over all pant !! I used to wear regular blue jeans almost exclusively until I tried these pants. I love the fit and the material. They are comfortable and wear well. I have sometimes taken the hammer loop feature off (cut it off) if I use the pants just for day wear and not work wear. They have a good choice of colours but I think they discontinued the very light tan one a while ago. I would say give these a try!
Date published: 2017-12-06
Rated 5 out of 5 by from my favourtie work pants but fit is tight Best pants for work on the market. Im an elevator mechaninc and my company orders these for us now. wish they were bigger in the thigh/pocket area. a little too tight for me. have to go a size up but then forced to wear a belt. Hopefully this changes. I still would not wear anything else. could be slimmer at the ankle too.
Date published: 2015-05-28
  • y_2023, m_3, d_25, h_22
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_3.0.34
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_48
  • loc_en_CA, sid_1000754907, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=RELEVANCE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_homedepot-canada
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-4.0.0
  • CLOUD, getReviews, 44ms
  • REVIEWS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo_sdk, java_sdk, bvseo-4.0.0
  • CLOUD, getContent, 60ms
  • QUESTIONS, PRODUCT
  • bvseo-msg: The resource to the URL or file is currently unavailable.;